In the common-ray approximation of the coupling ray theory, the S-wave travel times in the coupling equations are approximated by the first-order perturbation expansion from the common reference ray. The common-ray approximation eliminates problems with ray tracing through S-wave singularities and also considerably simplifies the numerical algorithm of the coupling ray theory for S waves, but may introduce errors in travel times due to the perturbation from the common reference ray. The errors of S-wave travel times due to the common-ray approximation may be approximated by the second-order terms in the perturbation expansion. The first-order and second-order terms in the perturbation expansion can be calculated by simple numerical quadratures along the common reference ray.

The common reference ray may be represented by the isotropic common ray or by the anisotropic common ray. The anisotropic-common-ray approximation of the coupling ray theory is more accurate than the isotropic-common-ray approximation. The equations for the first-order and second-order perturbation expansions of travel time from both the isotropic and anisotropic common rays to the anisotropic-ray-theory rays have already been derived. We numerically test the equations in three smooth 1-D velocity models of differing degrees of anisotropy.

We first compare the second-order perturbation expansions of travel time from the isotropic common rays to the anisotropic common rays and vice versa. This comparison not only demonstrates the accuracy of the perturbation expansions, but also allows us to estimate the order of magnitude of the third-order, fourth-order and fifth-order terms in the perturbation expansions.

The first-order and second-order perturbation expansions of travel time from the isotropic common rays and from the anisotropic common rays to the anisotropic-ray-theory rays are then compared with the correct anisotropic-ray-theory travel times in order to illustrate the accuracy of the perturbation expansions and reliability of the error estimates.

Finally, the synthetic seismograms obtained by the isotropic-common-ray and anisotropic-common-ray approximations of the coupling ray theory are compared with the more accurate coupling-ray-theory synthetic seismograms simulated by the second-order perturbation expansion of travel time from the anisotropic common rays. In the numerical examples, the errors of the anisotropic-common-ray approximation of the coupling ray theory are considerably smaller than the errors of the isotropic-common-ray approximation.

Common-ray approximation, coupling ray theory, heterogeneous media, perturbation theory, seismic anisotropy, traveltime.

The incorrect version of the paper was published in
*Geophys. J. int.*, **171** (2007), 1064-1081.

Please, refer to the correct version of the paper published in
*Geophys. J. int.*, **175** (2008), 357-374.

The image of the paper in GIF 150dpi (1025 kB !) is designed for an instant screen preview.

The reprint is available in PostScript (10273 kB !!) and GZIPped PostScript (2773 kB !).

SW3D - main page of consortium